[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13616598#comment-13616598
 ] 

Phabricator commented on HIVE-3464:
-----------------------------------

vikram has commented on the revision "HIVE-3464 [jira] Merging join tree may 
reorder joins which could be invalid".

  Comments.

INLINE COMMENTS
  
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/CommonJoinResolver.java:332
 I am not sure these changes are relevant to this jira. There are already other 
jiras - HIVE-3996 and HIVE-4071 raised for issues in this section of code and 
currently blocked on HIVE-3891 which moves these changes into a different class.
  
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/CommonJoinResolver.java:357
 Same comment as above.
  
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/CommonJoinResolver.java:369
 Same as above.
  
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/CommonJoinResolver.java:381
 Same as above.

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.facebook.net/D5409

To: JIRA, navis
Cc: njain, vikram

                
> Merging join tree may reorder joins which could be invalid
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-3464
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3464
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Query Processor
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.0
>            Reporter: Navis
>            Assignee: Navis
>         Attachments: HIVE-3464.D5409.2.patch, HIVE-3464.D5409.3.patch, 
> HIVE-3464.D5409.4.patch, HIVE-3464.D5409.5.patch
>
>
> Currently, hive merges join tree from right to left regardless of join types, 
> which may introduce join reordering. For example,
> select * from a join a b on a.key=b.key join a c on b.key=c.key join a d on 
> a.key=d.key; 
> Hive tries to merge join tree in a-d=b-d, a-d=a-b, b-c=a-b order and a-d=a-b 
> and b-c=a-b will be merged. Final join tree is "a-(bdc)".
> With this, ab-d join will be executed prior to ab-c. But if join type of -c 
> and -d is different, this is not valid.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to