-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5312/#review8243
-----------------------------------------------------------



ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/udf_format_number.q
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5312/#comment17858>

    Each one of these queries triggers an MR job which adds time to the total 
test run. When possible please try to consolidate these queries into one, e.g.
    
    SELECT
      format_number(...)
      ...
      format_number(...)
    FROM src LIMIT 1;
    



ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/udf_format_number.q
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5312/#comment17859>

    Please add a note here explaining that this is actually 1 less than 
LONG_MAX (and one more than LONG_MIN), and include a pointer to HIVE-2733.



ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/udf_format_number.q
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5312/#comment17860>

    Are these values Double.MIN_VALUE and Double.MAX_VALUE? If so please add a 
note saying so.


- Carl


On 2012-05-30 23:56:23, Zhenxiao Luo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5312/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-05-30 23:56:23)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Carl Steinbach.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> HIVE-2694. Add Format UDF
> 
> 
> This addresses bug HIVE-2694.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2694
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/FunctionRegistry.java d62a6b6 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/udf/generic/GenericUDFFormatNumber.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong1.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong2.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong3.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong4.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong5.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong6.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong7.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/udf_format_number.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong1.q.out 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong2.q.out 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong3.q.out 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong4.q.out 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong5.q.out 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong6.q.out 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientnegative/udf_format_number_wrong7.q.out 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/show_functions.q.out 5ce8844 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/udf_format_number.q.out PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5312/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zhenxiao
> 
>

Reply via email to