The biggest offender by far is jackson-databind 2.4.0 .
Upgrading that single dependency to a current 2.18.8+ release would clear
the overwhelming majority of these cves.

I can try raising a pr for this.


Thanks
Simhadri G

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026, 4:21 AM Sai Hemanth Gantasala <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Ayush,
>
> I agree that we should address these, especially the critical ones, for
> the upcoming release. While achieving an "A" rating might be difficult, we
> should at least clean up the high-impact vulnerabilities to improve our
> security posture and perception.
>
> I'm planning to create an umbrella JIRA to track this effort and will link
> individual issues for each CVE we decide to tackle. I think prioritizing
> the critical issues for this cycle is definitely worth it. I'll start the
> umbrella ticket so we can coordinate the work.
>
> Thanks,
> Sai
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 6:03 PM Ayush Saxena <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>> I was randomly browsing our DockerHub page and noticed that our Docker
>> images currently show a big "E" security rating. I've attached a
>> screenshot along with the local text output (assuming the attachment
>> makes it through).
>>
>> If not, the following command should provide the vulnerability details
>> locally:
>> docker scout cves apache/hive:nightly
>>
>> I realize this isn't a problem we can completely eliminate. Given the
>> number of dependencies in the Hadoop/Hive ecosystem, achieving an "A"
>> rating is probably unrealistic. However, there may be a few
>> low-hanging issues that we could address without a significant
>> engineering effort.
>>
>> My understanding is that many of these reported CVEs are unlikely to
>> be directly exploitable in Hive deployments or may not impact Hive
>> functionality at all. Because of that, I don't see this as a "drop
>> everything and fix it" effort. That said, improving the score where
>> practical could help with the project's presentation and perception,
>> especially for users evaluating Hive from a security standpoint.
>>
>> Curious what others think:
>> * Do we have any plans or strategy around this?
>> * Are there easy wins worth pursuing?
>> * Or is the consensus simply that the current state is acceptable and
>> not worth spending cycles on? Maybe newbie tickets?
>>
>> Interested in hearing everyone's thoughts.
>>
>> -Ayush
>>
>

Reply via email to