Thanks everyone for the feedback!

If nobody objects, I plan to merge HIVE-28666 in ~24hrs. I also logged
INFRA-26381 [1] for the follow-up actions needed to deprecate the
wiki.

Feel free to comment here or under the respective tickets if you have
any ideas/thoughts about the process.

Best,
Stamatis

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26381

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:46 PM Ayush Saxena <ayush...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -Ayush
>
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 at 00:21, Aman Sinha <amansi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think you meant HIVE-28666 (not HIVE-28166).
> >
> > Makes total sense to me to move to a normal (and modern) git controlled 
> > process for the docs, although the migration could take some time.
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 8:08 AM Simhadri G <simhadri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I fully support improving the Hive documentation, as it's long overdue. 
> >> Moving the docs to the Hive website is a great step, making it easier for 
> >> contributors to update and maintain them.
> >>
> >> Additionally, we can incrementally enhance the Hive website by introducing 
> >> a search feature to help users navigate the documentation more 
> >> efficiently. It would also be beneficial to version the docs with every 
> >> new release, ensuring accuracy and relevance.
> >>
> >> So, it's a +1 from me!
> >>
> >> Thanks ,
> >> Simhadri G
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024, 8:46 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@apache.org> 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> The discussion has started in some parallel threads but for
> >>> traceability and discovery purposes I thought that it would be better
> >>> to start a dedicated thread to be sure that it won't be missed by
> >>> anyone.
> >>>
> >>> All the context and motivation is under HIVE-28166, so I will not
> >>> repeat those here. The current PR has already some approvals but since
> >>> this is a change that will have quite some impact on the Hive
> >>> documentation and our contributors I wanted to be sure that there is a
> >>> general consensus before moving forward.
> >>>
> >>> Please share your thoughts about the current plan described under
> >>> HIVE-28166, even if it is simply a +/-1
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Stamatis

Reply via email to