Thanks Vineet.
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17927 for the gitbox one.
-Jesús
On 2/28/19, 10:55 AM, "Vineet Garg" <vg...@cloudera.com.INVALID> wrote:
FYI I have opened an INFRA jira for RB issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17926. I personally prefer it
over github pull request for reviews.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:50 AM Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> I think it is a good idea, I can ask that the 'opened a new pull request'
> messages continue being sent to @dev, while the rest are sent to gitbox.
>
> -Jesús
>
>
> On 2/28/19, 9:55 AM, "Alan Gates" <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to sending the github mail to a separate list.
>
> I agree with Peter that seeing PR reviews is good. Wouldn't it be
> possible
> to craft a filter that only allowed through these mails?
>
> Alan.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:11 AM Peter Vary
<pv...@cloudera.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > The github mails in this form are just white noise, so I have added
> > filters to my mailbox to drop every github mail to another folder,
> just as
> > proposed by Jesús. So if we can do it by the infra it would be
> better. +1
> > from me.
> >
> > On the other hand, I miss the "review request created" messages of
> the
> > review board. These type of messages are lost in the shower of the
> github
> > letters. If anyone has an idea how to detect these that would be
> awesome.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> > > On Feb 28, 2019, at 08:59, Mani M <rmsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Good.
> > >
> > > With Regards
> > > M.Mani
> > > +61 432 461 087
> > >
> > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, 17:39 Jesus Camacho Rodriguez, <
> > > jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> We have had a similar discussion in the Calcite project too.
> > >>
> > >> Gitbox emails are being set to the dev@ list. These emails are
> produced
> > >> every time there is activity in the Hive Github repository and
are
> > creating
> > >> quite a lot of noise. The result is that it is really difficult
to
> > follow
> > >> any activity in the list.
> > >>
> > >> A possible alternative would be to send them to another list,
e.g.
> > >> gitbox@h.a.o. The idea is that having them in a list may still be
> > useful
> > >> as they may serve as a searchable archive of activity in the
repo.
> > >>
> > >> What do you think? Should we open an INFRA ticket to request
this?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Jesús
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
