-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/#review211725
-----------------------------------------------------------



Can we add some tests for the new feature?


ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ppd/SyntheticJoinPredicate.java
Line 182 (original)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/#comment297292>

    Can you bring this back and delete 'if (sourceKeys.size() > 0) {' below? 
This is just a style change and indenting so many lines will just make more 
difficult following code provenance.



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ppd/SyntheticJoinPredicate.java
Lines 284 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/#comment297291>

    We should add a call to extended version here as we did above for equality 
predicates. The only required change seems to be in _addParentReduceSink_ 
called from _createDerivatives_, which would receive the comparison operator 
from here. All the rest should already work as expected.
    
    I believe this could be addressed in this JIRA since it is not a lot of 
code. However, if it is not addressed, please create follow-up and leave a TODO.



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ppd/SyntheticJoinPredicate.java
Lines 318 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/#comment297296>

    return colExprMap.get(rsColName)



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ppd/SyntheticJoinPredicate.java
Lines 328 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/#comment297293>

    Can we move this method as _invertFunction_ utility method to 
_FunctionRegistry.java_?
    
    In addition, instead of relying on the function text, I believe it would be 
more robust to have the UDF as the input. In particular, we can use 
_funcDesc.getGenericUDF();_ when calling this method, then rely in e.g. _udf 
instanceof GenericUDFOPEqualOrGreaterThan_ for the checks.



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ppd/SyntheticJoinPredicate.java
Lines 330 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/#comment297295>

    Should we still return null if function text is not recognized?


- Jesús Camacho Rodríguez


On Jan. 3, 2019, 8:39 p.m., Deepak Jaiswal wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 3, 2019, 8:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive, Ashutosh Chauhan, Gopal V, Jesús Camacho Rodríguez, 
> and Jason Dere.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-16976
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-16976
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> DPP: SyntheticJoinPredicate transitivity for < > and BETWEEN
> 
> The patch supports predicates on non-equi joins and provides an interface for 
> storage handler to decide if it can use this optimization.
> Work to integrate this with DPP and semijoin will be done in separate JIRA.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/HiveStorageHandler.java 
> 2ebb149354 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/DynamicPartitionPruningOptimization.java
>  a1401aac72 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/GenTezUtils.java f8c7e18eb1 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/plan/ExprNodeDynamicListDesc.java 
> 676dfc9421 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ppd/SyntheticJoinPredicate.java 
> e97e44796f 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/cross_prod_1.q.out ac1f4eabd8 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/groupby_groupingset_bug.q.out 
> de74af6dff 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/semijoin.q.out 63a270e57d 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/subquery_in.q.out 07cc4dbabc 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/subquery_notin.q.out 29d8bbfb48 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/subquery_scalar.q.out e830835445 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/subquery_select.q.out d3cc980ca1 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69663/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Deepak Jaiswal
> 
>

Reply via email to