-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/62309/#review185348
-----------------------------------------------------------




ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/stats/annotation/StatsRulesProcFactory.java
Line 355 (original), 357 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62309/#comment261653>

    This comment can be deleted.



ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/filter_cardinality.q.out
Lines 1 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62309/#comment261651>

    No need for new tests. Plenty of coverage in existing tests.



ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/join47.q.out
Line 363 (original), 363 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62309/#comment261649>

    Is this expected? Seems like patch handled expressions only in Filter not 
in Join.
    Also, new estimates are suspiciously too low.



ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/join47.q.out
Line 562 (original), 562 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/62309/#comment261650>

    Expected ?


- Ashutosh Chauhan


On Sept. 13, 2017, 10:14 p.m., Vineet Garg wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/62309/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 13, 2017, 10:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Ashutosh Chauhan.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-17465
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-17465
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch fixes estimation of cardinality for filter with AND predicates.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   data/files/filterCard.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/stats/annotation/StatsRulesProcFactory.java
>  423913b56b 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/filter_cardinality.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/annotate_stats_deep_filters.q.out 
> 6e2975e671 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/annotate_stats_join_pkfk.q.out 
> e04c1c6bc5 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/filter_cardinality.q.out PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/join47.q.out 20dce5d3bb 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/explainuser_1.q.out 48c02a24ad 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vector_decimal_cast.q.out 
> c45210e562 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vector_if_expr.q.out 32d100180d 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vectorization_0.q.out db76eaaf1b 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vectorization_10.q.out f06c2dbcc6 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vectorization_17.q.out 1c07962d83 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vectorization_7.q.out 6c32ccf42d 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vectorization_short_regress.q.out 
> 66764cf42b 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/vectorized_nested_mapjoin.q.out 
> 2a95065203 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/mapjoin47.q.out 2904b68813 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/perf/query23.q.out dde707d0ea 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/smb_mapjoin_47.q.out 074600ef02 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/spark/vectorization_10.q.out 1f953575e3 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/spark/vectorization_12.q.out 4e26314499 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/spark/vectorization_17.q.out b43c506c6f 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/vectorization_10.q.out d2d9bf644b 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/vectorization_12.q.out 63ea984a33 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/vectorization_17.q.out c0186082df 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/vectorization_7.q.out 218d307915 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62309/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> * Added new tests
> * Updated existing tests
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vineet Garg
> 
>

Reply via email to