----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57728/#review169758 -----------------------------------------------------------
common/src/java/org/apache/hive/common/util/DateUtils.java Lines 84 (patched) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57728/#comment242327> Is there another class where to put this method? I don't think DateUtils is the place where we should keep this. - Sergio Pena On March 21, 2017, 5:28 p.m., Barna Zsombor Klara wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/57728/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 21, 2017, 5:28 p.m.) > > > Review request for hive and Sergio Pena. > > > Repository: hive-git > > > Description > ------- > > HIVE-16231: Parquet timestamp may be stored differently since HIVE-12767 > > > Diffs > ----- > > common/src/java/org/apache/hive/common/util/DateUtils.java > a1068ecce94e9ff1ae78008a0d8c6d67ca4f2690 > common/src/test/org/apache/hive/common/util/TestDateUtils.java PRE-CREATION > > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/parquet/MapredParquetOutputFormat.java > 26f1e75c7d659a634cd4eef3a0cb8e886b22722f > > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/parquet/ParquetRecordReaderBase.java > 8e33b7d437894b33b35f32913a3bc02f2a849ce3 > > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/parquet/timestamp/NanoTimeUtils.java > 5dc808800290f3274afbdff12134ac34387a746b > ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/parquet_int96_timestamp.q > 5de2c3f1244b8340b97eb0547fe66e52d80fb065 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57728/diff/2/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested loading timestamps from a parquet file written by spark. > > > Thanks, > > Barna Zsombor Klara > >
