Thanks Alan for the proposal. JDK8 seems to have very useful API. It should
be good to start using it.

+1.

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Rajat Khandelwal <
rajat.khandel...@inmobi.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Prasanth Jayachandran <
> pjayachand...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > Prasanth
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:55 PM -0800, "Thejas Nair" <
> > thejas.n...@gmail.com<mailto:thejas.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > There was a [DISCUSS] thread on the topic of moving to jdk8 for unit
> tests
> > [1], and many people also expressed the opinion that we should drop JDK 7
> > support in Hive. Public updates by Oracle was stopped on Apr 2015 [2].
> >
> > This vote thread proposes to dropping JDK 7 support in the next Apache
> Hive
> > 2.x release (ie master branch), so that we can start leveraging new
> > features in Java 8 and also libraries that require java8.
> >
> > [1] https://s.apache.org/hive-jdk8-test
> > [2] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
> >
> > Here is my +1.
> >
> > Vote ends in 72 hours.
> > Thanks,
> > Thejas
> >
> > PS: I think this would fall under "Code change" under Hive-bylaws, so it
> > doesn't seem to really require a formal vote thread. But I think this
> does
> > merit wider attention than a jira ticket.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rajat Khandelwal
> Tech Lead
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others
> authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance
> on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your
> system. The firm is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission
> of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its
> receipt.
>

Reply via email to