[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13139052#comment-13139052
]
[email protected] commented on HIVE-2535:
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2605/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for hive, Yongqiang He, Ning Zhang, and namit jain.
Summary
-------
The CompactIndexHandler determines if the reentrant query it creates is a
candidate for using the fact the index is sorted (it has an appropriate number
of non-partition conditions, and the query plan is of the form expected). It
sets the input format to HiveSortedInputFormat, and marks the FilterOperator
for the non-partition condition.
The HiveSortedInputFormat is extends HiveInputFormat, so its splits consist of
data from a single file, and its record reader is HiveBinarySearchRecordReader.
HiveBinarySearchRecordReader starts by assuming it is performing a binary
search. It sets the appropriate flags in IOContext, which acts as the means of
communication between the FilterOperators and the record reader. The
non-partition FilterOperator is responsible for executing a comparison between
the value in the row and column of interest and the constant. It also provides
the type of the generic UDF. It sets this data in the IOContext. As long as
the binary search continues the FilterOperators do not forward rows to the
operators below them. The record reader uses the comparison and the type of
the generic UDF to execute a binary search on the underlying RCFile until it
finds the block of interest, or determines that if any block is of interest it
is the last one. The search then proceeds linearly from the beginning of the
identified block. If ever in the binary search a problem occurs, like the
comparison fails for some reason, a linear search begins from the beginning of
the data which has yet to be eliminated.
Regardless of whether or not a binary search is performed, the record reader
attempts to end the linear search as soon as it can based on the comparison and
the type of the generic UDF.
This addresses bug HIVE-2535.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2535
Diffs
-----
trunk/common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/conf/HiveConf.java 1183507
trunk/conf/hive-default.xml 1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/ExprNodeGenericFuncEvaluator.java
1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/FilterOperator.java 1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/index/compact/CompactIndexHandler.java
1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/HiveBinarySearchRecordReader.java
PRE-CREATION
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/HiveInputFormat.java 1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/HiveRecordReader.java 1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/HiveSortedInputFormat.java
PRE-CREATION
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/IOContext.java 1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/RCFile.java 1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/RCFileRecordReader.java
1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/plan/FilterDesc.java 1183507
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/udf/generic/GenericUDFBaseCompare.java
1183507
trunk/ql/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/hooks/VerifyHiveSortedInputFormatUsedHook.java
PRE-CREATION
trunk/ql/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/TestHiveBinarySearchRecordReader.java
PRE-CREATION
trunk/ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/index_compact_binary_search.q
PRE-CREATION
trunk/ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/index_compact_binary_search.q.out
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2605/diff
Testing
-------
I added a test to verify the functionality of the HiveBinarySearchRecordReader.
I also added a .q file to test that this returns the correct results when the
underlying index is stored in an RCFile and when it is stored in as a text
file, with all of the supported operators.
I ran the .q files to verify they still pass.
I ran some queries to verify there was a CPU benefit to doing this. I saw as
much as a 45% reduction in the total CPU used by the map reduce job to scan the
index, for a large data set.
Thanks,
Kevin
> Use sorted nature of compact indexes
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-2535
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2535
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Kevin Wilfong
> Assignee: Kevin Wilfong
> Attachments: HIVE-2535.1.patch.txt
>
>
> Compact indexes are sorted based on the indexed columns, but we are not using
> this fact when we access the index.
> To start with, if the index is stored as an RC file, and if the predicate
> being used to access the index consists of only one non-partition condition
> using one of the operators >,>=,<,<=,= we could use a binary search (if
> necessary) to find the block to begin scanning for unfiltered rows, and we
> could use the result of comparing the value in the column with the constant
> (this is necessarily the form of a predicate which is optimized using an
> index) to determine when we have found all the rows which will be unfiltered.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
