+1 for all the reasons outlined.

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Thejas Nair <thejas.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> - This is great for users who want to take longer to upgrade from
> hadoop-1 and care mainly for bug fixes and incremental features,
> rather than radical new features.
> - The ability to release initial 2.x releases marked as alpha/beta
> also helps to get users to try it out, and also lets them choose what
> is right for them.
> - This also lets developers focus on major new features without the
> burden of maintaining hadoop-1 compatibility.
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We have discussed this for several weeks now.  Some concerns have been
>> raised which I have tried to address.  I think it is time to vote on it as
>> our release plan.  To be specific, I propose:
>>
>> Hive makes a branch-1 from the current master.  This would be used for 1.3
>> and future 1.x releases.  This branch would not deprecate existing
>> functionality.  Any new features in this branch would also need to be put on
>> master.  An upgrade path for users will be maintained from one 1.x release
>> to the next, as well as from the latest 1.x release to the latest 2.x
>> release.
>>
>> Going forward releases numbered 2.x will be made from master.  The purpose
>> of these releases will be to enable users to get access to new features
>> being developed in Hive and allow developers to get feedback.  It is
>> expected that for a while these releases will not be production ready and
>> will be clearly so labeled.  Some legacy features, such as Hadoop 1 and
>> MapReduce, will no longer be supported in the master.  Any critical bug
>> fixes (security, incorrect results, crashes) fixed in master will also be
>> ported to branch-1 for at least a year.  This time period may be extended in
>> the future based on the stability and adoption of 2.x releases.
>>
>> Based on Hive's bylaws this release plan vote will be open for 3 days and
>> all active committers have binding votes.
>>
>> Here's my +1.
>>
>> Alan.



-- 
Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
-Mark

Reply via email to