+1 for the proposal.
> On Feb 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Creating a new formal vote thread for this. After looking at the bylaws
> page, it looks like we need to have a formal vote on it by the PMC members.
>
> Thanks
> Vikram.
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Lefty Leverenz <leftylever...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> -- Lefty
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
>>> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
>>> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
>>> to the committer bylaws as follows (taken from the hadoop project bylaws
>>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html):
>>>
>>> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
>>> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
>> to
>>> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
>>> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
>>> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
>>>
>>> I am +1 on this.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Vikram.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
> -Mark
