Hi Alan, Thank you very much for the clarification. Naming the branch "next" for now is fine with me. I've done so.
Cheers, Brock On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > I'm not asking you to slow the work for the release. If you want to > branch, you can branch. What I'm asking is to hold on the numbering > scheme. So you could name the branch 'next' or something and then rename > once we come to agreement. Consensus in the community is important, and we > should avoid things that make that consensus harder. > > Alan. > > Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> > January 26, 2015 at 9:17 > Hi Alan, > > In all of my experience at Apache, I have been encouraged to release. > Contributors rightly want to see their hard work gets in the hands of the > users. That's why they contribute after all. Many contributors who have > features in trunk would like get those features out into the community. > This is completely reasonable of them. After all they've invested > significant time in this work. > > Thus I don't feel we should delay getting their contributions released > while we debate 1.0. The two have nothing todo with each other. I've > mentioned on the list and in person to Thejas that I wanted this release to > specifically avoid the 1.x discussion so it did not get bogged down in the > 1.x discussion. Again, this is completely reasonable. > > In short, everything I have experienced at Apache indicates that the folks > who want to release 0.15 should be free to do the work to make that happen. > > Brock > > > Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> > January 26, 2015 at 7:02 > Brock, > > Given there isn't consensus on numbering yet, could you holding off making > the 0.15 branch. We should come to a conclusion on whether we're doing > 0.14.1/0.15 or 1.0/1.1 before assigning anymore numbers. > > Alan. > > Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> > January 20, 2015 at 21:25 > Just a reminder that I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start > rolling release candidates on 2/9/2015. After branching I plan on > merging only blockers. > > Brock > Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> > January 12, 2015 at 14:37 > Hi, > > Projects are instructed in the incubator that releases gain new users and > other attention. Additionally, as discussed in this forum I'd like to > increase the tempo of our release process[1]. > > As such, I plan on following this process: > > 1) Provide two weeks notice of branching > 2) Provide two weeks to find issues on the branch and merging only blockers > 3) Roll release candidates until a release vote passes > > As such I plan on branching on 1/26/2015 and start rolling release > candidates on 2/9/2015. > > Cheers, > Brock > > 1. Note I am not complaining as I did not help with releases until this > point. > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. >
