[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13020233#comment-13020233
 ] 

jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on HIVE-1644:
-----------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/#review472
-----------------------------------------------------------



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/index/IndexWhereProcessor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/#comment953>

    I would have liked to just make a copy of pctx before I called 
rewriteForIndex(...) for every index, and then just use whichever of those 
corresponded to the index rewrite we chose.  However, the pctx did not seem to 
have an easy way to copy it.



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/index/IndexWhereProcessor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/#comment957>

    Do we need to propagate the residual predicate any further?



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/index/IndexWhereProcessor.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/#comment955>

    I'm kind of confused about how to check the actual table and not the 
metadata.  When we call indexTable.getPartitionKeys() and 
part.getTable.getPartitionKeys(), that method calls getPartitionKeys() on the 
underlying Thrift Tables.  Is there a way besides getPartitionKeys() that we 
should be using?



ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/index_opt_where.q
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/#comment956>

    I have not yet added the additional unit tests



ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/index_opt_where_partitioned.q.out
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/#comment954>

    I fixed the labeling for this case, but would it make sense to label our 
stages differently for indexing?  We only relabel correctly as long as we're 
overwriting the highest numbered stage, since we only relabel a single task.  
Or, should it relabel all tasks in the whole plan?  We only have easy access to 
the context.currentTask when we iterate through in IndexWhereProcessor (line 
153)


- Russell


On 2011-04-15 08:08:14, Russell Melick wrote:
bq.  
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
bq.  https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/
bq.  -----------------------------------------------------------
bq.  
bq.  (Updated 2011-04-15 08:08:14)
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Review request for hive.
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Summary
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  Review request for HIVE-1644.12.patch
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  This addresses bug HIVE-1644.
bq.      https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1644
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Diffs
bq.  -----
bq.  
bq.    common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/conf/HiveConf.java a21f589 
bq.    conf/hive-default.xml c42197f 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/ExecDriver.java 6437385 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/TableScanOperator.java 
c02d90b 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/index/AbstractIndexHandler.java 
dd0186d 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/index/HiveIndexHandler.java 
411b78f 
bq.    
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/index/compact/CompactIndexHandler.java 
1f01446 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Table.java 50db44c 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/GenMRTableScan1.java 
6162676 
bq.    
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/IndexWhereResolver.java
 PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/PhysicalOptimizer.java 
0ae9fa2 
bq.    
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/index/IndexWhereProcCtx.java
 PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/index/IndexWhereProcessor.java
 PRE-CREATION 
bq.    
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/index/IndexWhereTaskDispatcher.java
 PRE-CREATION 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/ParseContext.java 937a7b3 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/SemanticAnalyzer.java 
f0aca84 
bq.    ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/plan/MapredWork.java 73391e9 
bq.    ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/index_opt_where.q PRE-CREATION 
bq.    ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/index_opt_where_partitioned.q 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/index_opt_where_simple.q PRE-CREATION 
bq.    ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/index_opt_where.q.out PRE-CREATION 
bq.    ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/index_opt_where_partitioned.q.out 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.    ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/index_opt_where_simple.q.out 
PRE-CREATION 
bq.  
bq.  Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/558/diff
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Testing
bq.  -------
bq.  
bq.  
bq.  Thanks,
bq.  
bq.  Russell
bq.  
bq.



> use filter pushdown for automatically accessing indexes
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-1644
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-1644
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Indexing
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: John Sichi
>            Assignee: Russell Melick
>         Attachments: HIVE-1644.1.patch, HIVE-1644.10.patch, 
> HIVE-1644.11.patch, HIVE-1644.12.patch, HIVE-1644.13.patch, 
> HIVE-1644.2.patch, HIVE-1644.3.patch, HIVE-1644.4.patch, HIVE-1644.5.patch, 
> HIVE-1644.6.patch, HIVE-1644.7.patch, HIVE-1644.8.patch, HIVE-1644.9.patch
>
>
> HIVE-1226 provides utilities for analyzing filters which have been pushed 
> down to a table scan.  The next step is to use these for selecting available 
> indexes and generating access plans for those indexes.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to