Those tests run fine for me.
Is there any chance that we can setup a Hudson job for the 0.6 branch on
hudson.apache.org?
It should be pretty straightforward to do if we copy the configuration from
here:
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Hive-trunk-h0.20/
Thanks.
Carl
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Ashish Thusoo <athu...@facebook.com>wrote:
> I got the following test failures on the release candidate...
>
> groupby2.q
> groupby3.q
> groupby4.q
> groupby5.q
> groupby6.q
>
> not sure if this is just in my env or if others have seen this...
>
> A sample of the diff is below and seems to be related to some plan ordering
> or some change in plan. Is anyone else getting this?
>
> Ashish
>
> -------------------------
> [junit] diff -b -I'\(\(<java version=".*"
> class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">\)\|\(<string>.*/tmp/.*</string>\)\|\(<string>file:.*</string>\)\|\(<string>[0-9]\{10\}</string>\)\|\(<string>/.*/warehouse/.*</string>\)\)'
> /data/users/athusoo/tmp/hive-0.6.0/src/build/ql/test/logs/positive/groupby6.q.xml
> /data/users/athusoo/tmp/hive-0.6.0/src/ql/src/test/results/compiler/plan/groupby6.q.xml
> [junit] 352,353c352
> [junit] < <object class="java.lang.Enum"
> method="valueOf">
> [junit] <
> <class>org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode</class>
> [junit] ---
> [junit] > <object
> class="org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode" method="valueOf">
> [junit] 878,879c877
> [junit] < <object class="java.lang.Enum" method="valueOf">
> [junit] <
> <class>org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode</class>
> [junit] ---
> [junit] > <object
> class="org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode" method="valueOf">
>
> --------------------------
>
> ________________________________________
> From: John Sichi [jsi...@facebook.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:22 PM
> To: <dev@hive.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] hive 0.6.0 release candidate 0
>
> Yeah, the scripts should only be needed in configurations where JDO is told
> not to automatically update the schema. This is recommended for production
> environments.
>
> For this particular release, taking a downtime while running the scripts is
> a good idea due to the nature of the changes (e.g. altering the primary key
> on COLS). That needn't be true in general for additive-only changes.
>
> JVS
>
> On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:38 PM, John Sichi <jsi...@facebook.com> wrote:
> >> The tarballs are at
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~jvs/hive-0.6.0-candidate-0
> >>
> >> Carl did some sanity testing on it already, but any additional testing
> you can do before voting helps to ensure a quality release.
> >>
> >> JVS
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I am checking it out now. It seems like since i have used two trunk
> > versions since hive the view related tables have already been created.
> > I do not need the update script.
>
>
