arturobernalg commented on PR #707: URL: https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/707#issuecomment-3193743252
> > > Hi all, > > > > The page https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/103 suggests `103` should only be for HTTP/2 or later. Should this PR only apply to HTTP/2? > > > > > > For what I understand MDN’s note is a deployment recommendation, not a protocol limit. RFC 8297 does not restrict 103 to HTTP/2+ > > > > Check. I wonder if the fact that this is an RFC marked "Experimental" should be of concern, or at least mentioned in the Javadoc. > > The RFC text is immutable, so the body still says “Experimental” (that’s the original 2017 publication). However, the IESG later changed the status to Proposed Standard; that action is recorded separately and Datatracker now shows the badge accordingly. Official status-change doc (Feb 5, 2025) is here.  For reference, the original RFC body that still reads “Experimental” is here (unchanged by design). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
