[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17997190#comment-17997190
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCLIENT-2381:
-----------------------------------------------
[~jonenst] My response was not meant to be disrespectful. I am sorry if it came
across that way. I do not want to close this ticket. Your request is
legitimate. Runtime constraints common in 200x are no longer valid. Application
containers encourage the use of system properties these days. However, to solve
the problem one needs to reverse a long standing policy and this would take
effort and due process. Everything I have said about running a poll on the dev
or user list was no irony. If no one takes it upon themselves to organize the
process the ticket will remain open forever and there will unlikely be any
resolution. There more pressing issues that always take precedence. Scratching
your own itch is the only way here.
Oleg
> Allow environment proxy settings by default or strongly document this decision
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HTTPCLIENT-2381
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-2381
> Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Jon Harper
> Priority: Major
>
> Hi,
> projects keep getting burned by the fact that is it impossible to set runtime
> environment variables to use http proxies. My personal latest frustration is
> with central-publishing-maven-plugin which is unusable in many companies
> where using a corporate proxy is mandatory (no direct internet access). This
> has happened times and times again, for example.
> https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-vault/issues/75
> https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/issues/35815
> It seems like every time this happen, people then just add the required code
> to be able to set an environment variable or a system property, after the
> initial pain of beeing blocked by this problem.
> Should this project be changed so that by default without code you can use
> system properties to configure the proxy ? That is have systemProperties=true
> everywhere and replace useSystemProperties() by disableSystemProperties().
> Using the same system properties as the jdk clients is the simplest, but if
> needed it would still provide benefit if it were entirely new system
> properties (so no backwards compatibilty as these properties would never have
> been set), at least people would be to use proxies without changing some code
> or worse changing some third party library.
> An alternative would be to add a prominent note in the docs to warn that
> unless specific code is added, using a proxy is impossible and makes the
> client unusable in many corporate contexts. Maybe also document why this
> design decision was made, what are the advantages of doing this so that users
> at least understand what they gain in exchange for their suffering.
> Thanks in advance,
> Jon
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
