Hi Oleg, Got it. I had seen the ProxyClient case
Thank you. Arturo Bernal arturobern...@yahoo.com > On 20 Mar 2021, at 10:24, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 12:41 +0100, Arturo Bernal wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I would like to add the Http "CONNECT” method (described in section >> 4.3.6 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-4.3.6) that would >> easily created by HttpRequest (deprecated by active at the momment) >> and ClassicRequestBuilder. I think i will need to make change in both >> (core and client) module >> >> The initiative is basically given to allow all the possible methods >> described in “tools.ietf.org" >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> Arturo Bernal >> arturobern...@yahoo.com >> >> > > Hi Arturo > > The CONNECT method is quite special and when executed as a normal > request would end up corrupting the connection and polluting the > connection pool. This is the reason why there is no special class > representing the CONNECT method. There is ProxyClient for those special > cases when one wants to establish a tunnel through an HTTP proxy. > > Oleg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
