On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 16:27 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Right now we have: > > > > org.apache.http.HttpMessage<T> > > > > Do we really want to have any kind of object in there or would this be > > better: > > > > org.apache.http.HttpMessage<T extends HttpEntity> > > > > ? > > > > Gary > > It was done with HTTP/2 support in mind. Most likely HttpEntity > interface will no longer work well for HTTP/2 transport. However I would > still like to have a common message class shared by both HTTP/1.1 and > HTTP/2 transports. > OK, so that sounds like leave it as HttpMessage<T> for now. Gary > Oleg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
