On 20 September 2014 13:49, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 08:37 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: >> I do not understand why there is not a link to a pre-built site for this RC. >> > > Website is not a release artifact and is not a part of the release > process.
No, but the RM is expected to run at least the RAT and Clirr reports, and include them in the vote e-mail to show that these have been done. Also the review can check if there are any obvious errors in the site so these can be fixed before deployment. Even though the site is not part of release process, it is an important part of the public face of the project. >> Does the RM expect each reviewer to generate their own site to check that >> the RAT and Clirr reports are OK for example? >> > > Yes, though running 'mvn clirr:check apache-rat:check' is much > preferred. > Oleg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
