On 10/29/26 16:34, MG wrote:
Hi blackdrag*,
would something like the following work, assuming an exception inside
the async block would be wrapped in an AsyncWrapperException by Groovy:
for await (value in channel) try {
println value
}
catch(AsyncWrapperException ae) {
...
}
catch(Throwable t) {
...
}
That works if getting the value throws the exception, which is actually
the case. The problem is that channel does not know about the exception
in the async block, unless you tell the channel. But that would make the
example look ugly and it would still work, till there is an exception.
bye Jochen
