+1 On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 2:48 AM Guillaume Laforge <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 5:06 PM James Daugherty <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> The Apache Grails community has voted to approve the release of Apache >> Grails GitHub Actions 1.0.0. >> >> As the incubation host, we now kindly request the Groovy PMC to review >> & approve our ASF release. >> >> These actions are being formally released as the Geb project plans to >> use them and we also use them in all of our GitHub CI builds. >> >> Grails vote thread: >> * https://lists.apache.org/thread/sbsdsffqfrb562pg55vrgsf6vb3jbcjz >> >> Vote result thread: >> * https://lists.apache.org/thread/mw69brfdf5wloytco7v8k9jgtyzr817t >> >> The tag for this release is: >> * (grails-github-actions) >> https://github.com/apache/grails-github-actions/releases/tag/v1.0.0 >> >> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r79034): >> Source release: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/grails/actions/1.0.0/sources >> >> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/grails/KEYS >> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Grails (incubating) >> GitHub Actions 1.0.0. >> >> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with >> sha512sum): >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >> >> The vote for this release is open for a minimum of 72 hours. >> [ ] +1 Release Apache Grails (incubating) GitHub Actions 1.0.0 >> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok >> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Grails (incubating) GitHub Actions 1.0.0 >> because... >> > > > -- > *Guillaume Laforge* > Apache Groovy committer > Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud <https://cloud.google.com/> > > - Blog: glaforge.dev > - X: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> > - Bluesky: @glaforge.dev <https://bsky.app/profile/glaforge.dev> > - Mastodon: @[email protected] <http://%[email protected]/> > >
