Hi Jochen, 1. I read your post multiple times, and after overcoming the initial "How complicated is this, I thought the indy mechanism was supposed to take care of that... ?" reaction of my brain ( ;-) ), I think I can approximately follow what you were suggesting in broad strokes. 2. However "We have to keep the cost of (indy) initialization much lower than we do right now" definitely gets my prize for the TLDR/executive version ;-) 3. I just saw Eric offered to help with a potential prototype, which would be great - maybe Grooyv indy will one day be as fast as its non-indy counterpart, even under heavy stress... G-)
Cheers, mg Am 13.08.2025 um 21:28 schrieb Jochen Theodorou:
I think it is the cost of initialization. We have to keep that much lower than we do right now. Sadly you are the only reacting to that mail so far. I thought I kept it simple enough...
