Hi Jochen > The compile error is that a class gets left behind in the > CompileUnit's classesToCompile. I think this is because I am returning a > source unit that contains both outer and inner classes when the look up > should have returned an inner class. What is the right way to fix this? > Should I add the source unit but return a dummy classnode that is not > resolved yet?
This works great for classes without generic types. But for classes with generic types, if I return a ClassHelper.make(theName) through LookupResults(classNode, null), then I get this error for classes with generic types The class com.company.v2.shared.model.ImmutableKey.Builder<T> (supplied > with 1 type parameter) refers to the class > com.company.v2.shared.model.ImmutableKey.Builder which takes no parameters How do I handle this? regards Saravanan On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:51 AM Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: > On 12.06.25 16:07, Saravanan Palanichamy wrote: > > Thank you Jochen, > > > > I made some progress based on your recommendations in this manner > > > > 1. Added one source file as source unit to the compilation unit > > 2. I use a compilation unit that uses my custom ClassNodeResolver that > > derives from the base ClassNodeResolver > > 3. When it hits the findClassNode function, I call the parent, if the > > parent returned null, I then look in my directory folder for the > > file (I use the node name, replace the .'s with /'s and look for the > > file in my source folders) > > 4. And it works beautifully as it goes through resolving things for me > > > > Right now I feel like the kitten that unravelled the dependency string > > ball.😃 , thank you very much for helping with this > > nice > > [...] > > The compile error is that a class gets left behind in the > > CompileUnit's classesToCompile. I think this is because I am returning a > > source unit that contains both outer and inner classes when the look up > > should have returned an inner class. What is the right way to fix this? > > Should I add the source unit but return a dummy classnode that is not > > resolved yet? > > yeah please try that. > > bye Jochen >
