MG, > On 6. 2. 2025, at 21:05, MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > I was talking about an ideal world, as a starting point on how things imho > should behave (and why), as the point towards which one should try to move as > far as constraints such as backward compatibility allows.
In ideal world there should be compiler options/configurations/pragmas for all such debatable things, with a well-known and easily accessible setups for backward compatibility in case of breaking improvements, allowing each programmer to personally decide which (and for which particular /sub-/project) to embrace and which not. Of course it would be sort of lots of extra work for the guys who do the hard work on the compiler; and probably it would make it slower, too. TANSTAAFL. Thanks and all the best, OC
