Here's a PR that does what I think we need to do: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2136
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:38 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > > Well, most of those files are false positives. The "JavaSE" (JDK) > still has many javax packages whereas only JavaEE classes are > affected. > > As far as I can see, there's the handful of classes we know about in > groovy-servlet and some related test files and a related build file. > > There's also some javax.inject references in our build files, but that > is a separate tooling issue and doesn't affect any visible artifacts > that we produce. > > We also have some javax.annotation annotations usage for some rarely > used files, but they are essentially a tooling/documentation thing - > not so much related to the JavaEE change. > > But I agree we should look at those before Groovy 5 is released. > > Cheers, Paul. > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:06 PM <jost.schwi...@it.nrw.de> wrote: > > > > Sorry, "only" 133 files: > > https://github.com/search?q=javax+repo%3Aapache%2Fgroovy+path%3A*.groovy+language%3AGroovy+language%3AGroovy+&type=code&ref=advsearch > > > > (The advanced search somehow dropped the "javax" part... 🤷♂️) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jost.schwi...@it.nrw.de <jost.schwi...@it.nrw.de> > > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 1:59 PM > > To: dev@groovy.apache.org > > Subject: RE: Replacing javax.* with jakarta.* > > > > Thanx for your fast response! > > > > We have 5 projects using groovy-servlet - and Tomcat 9 support will end > > 2025... > > > > I know that e.g. groovy-xml is also using javax. > > > > OMG, a quick code search in the groovy repository finds over 2400 files: > > https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fgroovy+path%3A*.groovy+language%3AGroovy+language%3AGroovy&type=Code&ref=advsearch&l=Groovy&l=Groovy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> > > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 12:02 PM > > To: dev@groovy.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Replacing javax.* with jakarta.* > > > > Thanks for the prompt Jost. I just added a comment in the issue. > > TL;DR, yes we should do that. Help welcome as we haven't had any folks > > volunteer to do that yet. > > > > Note, there are other projects like Micronaut, Grails, etc. that have > > already advanced moving forward with Jakarta changes. > > Also, when you say many subprojects, what did you have in mind over and > > above groovy-servlet? > > > > Cheers, Paul. > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 6:40 PM <jost.schwi...@it.nrw.de> wrote: > > > > > > Regarding to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11190 > > > > > > All "javax.*" libs have to be renamed to "jakarta.*" - e.g. when > > > switching Tomcat from 9 to 10 (Jakarta EE 9). > > > (Special "thanx" to SUN for this "service"! 🙄) > > > > > > There are many Groovy subprojects using javax.* ... 🤷♂️ > > > Are there any plans to adapt Groovy accordingly? > > > > > > Thanx in advance! > > > Jost
