Hi Jochen,
Groovy relies on ASM lib directly, so it would save lots of work if we
could have an abstract layer whose API aligns with ASM lib, just change ASM
package name(org.objectweb.asm) with Groovy package name, e.g.
org.apache.groovy.classfile.
Cheers,
Daniel Sun
On 2024/01/21 13:05:49 Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> On 20.01.24 17:47, Daniel Sun wrote:
> > Hi Jochen,
> >
> > Both ASM lib and Class-File API are good, I would like to have an
> > abstract layer for them. The API for the abstract layer could be align with
> > ASM lib as Groovy relies on ASM lib heavily.
> >
> > If Groovy finds Class-File API is avaible, use Class-File API as the
> > implementation for an abstract layer, otherwise use ASM lib.
>
> hmm... yes. I see ASM API as less intrusive in the way you would handle
> things, thus this abstracted API would proably look a lot like the
> Class-File API?
>
> bye Jochen
>
>
