If record grammar changes are indeed coming for Groovy 4, then I would vote for a beta 2. Release candidate for me would have only small bug fixes, no feature additions.
From: Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 4:51 AM To: Groovy_Developers <dev@groovy.apache.org>; Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> Subject: [EXT] Re: [DISCUSS] Next Groovy 4 release should be RC-1 External Email: Use caution with links and attachments. Would be nice to move to RC-stage sooner than later! Guillaume On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:58 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au<mailto:pa...@asert.com.au>> wrote: Hi folks, We have had mostly good feedback on 4.0.0-beta-1 and Groovy 4 is mostly feature complete. I am thinking of skipping beta-2 and moving straight to RC-1. Does anyone see problems with this? With JDK17 out, I think it would be good to get Groovy 4 out soon too. Please let me know if there are any changes you think require a beta-2 or anything you regard as must have items for 4.0.0 final. Thanks, Paul. -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/glaforge.appspot.com/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Oe30UloUjl4zEuQ1Wq3o6F_hDiJH2u_JbaI2vcp7jJD_U9Gt2XUxIIZIaZFZmipmsK5QrMk$> Twitter: @glaforge<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/twitter.com/glaforge__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Oe30UloUjl4zEuQ1Wq3o6F_hDiJH2u_JbaI2vcp7jJD_U9Gt2XUxIIZIaZFZmipm_v2sJ24$>
