+1 Remko. On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:21 AM Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Sent from my primitive tricorder > > On 5 Mar 2020, at 12:23, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > > > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.2 release! > This with the switch regression fixed. > > This release includes 25 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the > changelog: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12346991 > > Tag: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_3_0_2 > Tag commit id: 0c4cdf57fadcc9045c25c2ddc7728893555da56b > > The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r38398). > Source release: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.2/sources > Convenience binaries: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.2/distribution > > Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 3.0.2. > > Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members: > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval > Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with > sha256sum): > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.2 > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.2 because... > > Here is my vote: > > +1 (binding) > > >
