I was trying to build on Java 11 and got

> Ambiguous method overloading for method java.io.File#<init>.
  Cannot resolve which method to invoke for [null, class java.lang.String]
due to overlapping prototypes between:
        [class java.lang.String, class java.lang.String]
        [class java.io.File, class java.lang.String]

https://gradle.com/s/ydqvmbvngsshk

I thought we can / should build with Java 11?

Guillaume

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 7:37 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:

>
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 3.0.2 release!
>
> This release includes 22 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the
> changelog:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12346991
>
> Tag:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_3_0_2
> Tag commit id: 56391a270c32b4881eb8f6416f6a3b5272738fd1
>
> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r38379).
> Source release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.2/sources
> Convenience binaries:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/3.0.2/distribution
>
> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 3.0.2.
>
> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with
> sha256sum):
> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 3.0.2
> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 3.0.2 because...
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>

-- 
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer
Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform

Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Twitter: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge>

Reply via email to