On 24/02/2019 05:40, Paul King wrote:
Looking forward to seeing where it goes and hopefully with plenty of Groovy :-)


It was a little disappointing when IBM pulled the plug on Project Zero:
https://searchmicroservices.techtarget.com/tip/Project-Zero-a-RESTful-new-beginning-for-IBM
That could have been a Domino replacement if steered in the right direction.

I am not sure that would not have given up too many of the things that make the platform powerful and unique (and having to use Websphere was always going to be a big problem) - but we will never know. Alas IBM has made so many half hearted attempts to modernize Domino over the years (basing the Notes client on the Eclipse platform - without ever really enticing people and giving them enough tool support to make them consider developing Domino-Eclipse-apps; or the "JSF 1.5 + GUI editor" XPages technology, that, in theory, would also have allowed RDBMS development interwoven with the Domino document centric DB), which all ended half baked. It always felt as if IBM never really knew what to do with its long running product.

I hope & expect HCL to do a much better job at this - hopefully with a lot of Groovy :-)

Cheers,
mg


On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 5:14 AM MG <mg...@arscreat.com <mailto:mg...@arscreat.com>> wrote:

    Hi guys,

    as some of you night know, IBM has sold IBM/Lotus Domino to HCL
    
(https://www.zdnet.com/article/ibm-sells-software-portfolio-including-notes-and-domino-to-hcl-for-1-8b/,

    
https://www.teamstudio.com/blog/why-ibms-sale-of-lotus-notes-to-hcl-is-a-good-thing).
    While it is unclear what that means for the platform, it has always
    seemed to me that Domino and Groovy would be a match made in heaven:
    Groovy could (due to its static & dynamic nature, performance and
    functional-orientation) replace all existing Domino languages: Java
    (obviously; replace or extend), LotusScript (yup - replace ;-) ), and
    Formula Language (Groovy itself, or the syntax compatible, high
    performance Groovy variety coming with Elasticsearch
    
(https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/modules-scripting-painless.html)).



    My question would be, if anyone has ever talked to the HCL people and
    floated the idea, not solely, but also with regards to the fact that
    some Open Collectives being funded by a single company (e.g.
    https://opencollective.com/hyper-star-samsung-next-decentralization-grant).

    Cheers,
    mg

    PS: I am a database/web developer who is formally part of a Domino
    Notes
    team (I used to do Domino development at the time of R5/6), and
    nowadays
    I only access Domino through the (excellent) OpenNTF Java API if
    needed
    (https://oda.openntf.org; using Groovy, of course G-) ), and I hear
    about these developments from consultants/colleagues (who suffer
    through
    using LotusScript now that I have introduced them to Groovy G-) ),
    so it
    might very well be that information about the plans of HCL have
    surfaced, which I am not aware of, which would make this idea mute...

    PPS: For those who hate Domino/Notes, consider that it is one of the
    only surviving RAD tools, while being based on one of the oldest,
    proven, powerful & document-centric NoSQL databases. Imho, all it
    would
    need is a little Groovy push, to make this a truly impressive
    platform... :-)






Reply via email to