+1


> On Dec 22, 2018, at 23:37, Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Build successful on OSX. No errors.
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
> JCP EC Associate Seat
> http://andresalmiray.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
> --
> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and 
> those who don't.
> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:28 PM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear development community,
>> 
>> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.5.5 release!
>> 
>> This release includes 20 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12344435
>> 
>> Tag: 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_2_5_5
>> Tag commit id: 5014d858d081ca463d03128e5d6eb2440184f492
>> 
>> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r31631).
>> Source release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/2.5.5/sources
>> Convenience binaries: 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/2.5.5/distribution
>> 
>> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 2.5.5.
>> 
>> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members:
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
>> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with sha256sum):
>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html
>> 
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 
>> three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.5.5
>> [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok
>> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.5.5 because...
>> 
>> Here is my vote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 

Reply via email to