If there is willingness to accept contributions in that area then I'd be happy to give it a shot. I would be much happier myself if the tooling, especially IntelliJ, had a better chance of understanding the types, especially when closures are used as arguments, for DGM methods.
Marcin On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:08 AM Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > I presume you mean generics wildcards. There are already some uses. Very > early on there were some issues with the type checker recognizing some > wildcard variants, so we avoided adding them. We have made some fixes but > haven't gone back in many cases and updated the DGM methods to see if they > can now be improved. > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:00 AM Daniil Ovchinnikov < > daniil.ovchinni...@jetbrains.com> wrote: > >> Hi all - >> >> Any plans to add wildcards into DGM methods? >> >> — >> >> Daniil Ovchinnikov >> JetBrains >> >>
