Built and tested from source. There are 4 javadoc warnings
> Task :javadocAll /Users/aalmiray/Downloads/groovy-2.6.0-alpha-4/src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/ast/tools/GenericsUtils.java:788: warning - Tag @link: malformed: "#makeDeclaringAndActualGenericsTypeMap(ClassNode, ClassNode" /Users/aalmiray/Downloads/groovy-2.6.0-alpha-4/src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/ast/tools/GenericsUtils.java:788: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: #makeDeclaringAndActualGenericsTypeMap(ClassNode, ClassNode 2 warnings > Task :javadoc /Users/aalmiray/Downloads/groovy-2.6.0-alpha-4/src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/ast/tools/GenericsUtils.java:788: warning - Tag @link: malformed: "#makeDeclaringAndActualGenericsTypeMap(ClassNode, ClassNode" /Users/aalmiray/Downloads/groovy-2.6.0-alpha-4/src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/ast/tools/GenericsUtils.java:788: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: #makeDeclaringAndActualGenericsTypeMap(ClassNode, ClassNode 2 warnings And quite the number of warnings related to asciidoc stylesheets. All tests passed. +1 (binding) ------------------------------------------- Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast JCP EC Associate Seat http://andresalmiray.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray -- What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear development community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.6.0-alpha-4 release! > > As per discussions on the user list, this is the last planned release for > the > GROOVY_2_6_X branch. This branch was designed as a cut-back version > of Groovy 3.0 back-ported to run on JDK 7 but with features missing that > required JDK 8. It was intended to help porting towards Groovy 3.0 for > those stuck on JDK 7. This alpha version is the version to use to help > with porting towards 3.0 if you are stuck on JDK 7. Our intention now is > to prioritise moving towards 3.0 faster. > > This release includes 65 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the > changelog: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12318123&version=12342855 > > Tag: https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a= > tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_2_6_0_ALPHA_4 > Tag commit id: 469016288baa219f8c04c6ecc95a082074f31901 > > The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r27680). > Source release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > dist/dev/groovy/2.6.0-alpha-4/sources > Convenience binaries: https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > dist/dev/groovy/2.6.0-alpha-4/distribution > > Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 2.6.0-alpha-4. > > Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members: > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval > Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with > sha256sum): > https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.6.0-alpha-4 > [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.6.0-alpha-4 because... > > Here is my vote: > > +1 (binding) > >
