Hi Daniel,
On 12.05.2018 15:51, Daniel.Sun wrote:
Hi mg,
I am trying to reduce the time on smart phone and computer to relax
eyes :)
That sounds like a good idea :-)
(Have you already tried reducing the blue component on every display ? I
do that with every monitor - at first the image looks yellow
tinted/dark, but our brain adjusts to this quite quickly and yellow
becomes white (unless the brain has something to compare it too ;-) )
As for Groovy, I plan to support raw string[1] introduced by Java11
since no similar thing in Groovy.
Definitely a good feature for Groovy to have, imho :-)
Some days ago I discussed it with
Guillaume, and I will start a VOTE thread to collect three +1 from PMC
members before working on the new feature. In addition, I am going to fix
STC issues and improve type infer,
That sounds great.
Don't know where we are discussion-wise on this topic, but maybe it
would make sense that I work on var/final actually having the assigned
RHS type in parallel to you (as time allows)... - thoughts (apart from
"flow typing gives you the same thing", for which I believe I have
already given examples showing that it is not ;-) ) ?
some of which are really hard to fix...
no wonder they have not been fixed for a long time. Apart from STC, I am
going to implement native method/constructor reference for better
performance(as you know, current method/constructor reference is based on
method closure).
Don't know what Paul/Jochen think about this, but I would like to have
that :-)
Many things on my TODO list... After all of the thing are completed, I want
to add a new DSL(something similar to LINQ in C#) to Groovy, it can be a
subproject of Groovy or just my personal project...
My vote for Subproject of Groovy - it would definitely make Groovy even
more attractive (I admit I am happy with functional type method
chaining, I mostly used Linq under C# for group-by operations, but I
know many people love it), and it has a bigger chance of drawing in
other interested developers :-)
I am not sure, but from my experience, maybe we could do things a
differently from the way C# does them, and (optionally?) keep more of
the Linq representation, instead of completely turning it into an AST
representation ? I remember that it was a hard problem (see re-linq
project) to turn that AST representation back into e.g. SQL - which
seemed silly, since Linq is modelled after SQL, and is therefore very
similar syntax-wise...
Cheers,
mg
