Hi Paolo, for some reason your build isn't getting the latest snapshots. If you run locally, it will still fail but with a known issue related to final variable analysis which is on my list for rc-2.
Cheers, Paul. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:23 AM, Paolo Di Tommaso <paolo.ditomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > The nextflow joint build is still failing badly. > > http://ci.groovy-lang.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=JointBuilds_Nextflow_ > Groovy25xJointBuild > > > it's a -1 (tho not binding) > > > p > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > >> >> Dear development community, >> >> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1 release! >> >> This release includes 18 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the >> changelog: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >> ctId=12318123&version=12342817 >> >> Tag: https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag >> ;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_2_5_0_RC_1 >> Tag commit id: 1c709fc51ffb1b1ab78d8c66dfc4aa2da523c0b9 >> >> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r26192). >> Source release: https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >> dist/dev/groovy/2.5.0-rc-1/sources >> Convenience binaries: https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >> dist/dev/groovy/2.5.0-rc-1/distribution >> >> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/KEYS >> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1. >> >> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members: >> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval >> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with >> sha256sum): >> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >> >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >> least three +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1 >> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok >> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.5.0-rc-1 because... >> >> Here is my vote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >
