I may agree that double back-tick is not nice, however the rationale of this choice is that this syntax is meant to enable *raw* string literals i.e. a string for which is not required to escape the content of *any* character. In this context it makes sense. They are created exactly how they are typed.
I have a few of use cases in which this would be very useful (think bash scripts that can contain slashes, bash-slashes, dollar chars, back-ticks, etc). p On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Daniel.Sun <sun...@apache.org> wrote: > Double backticks look a bit ugly IMO... I prefer the same way to escape, > i.e. > use \ to escape. > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >
