+1 with a few comments below. There has been discussion about releases for 2.4.9, 2.5.0-beta-1 and 3.0.0-ea-1. Perhaps we should split between us? I'd suggest I do the first two with you as "co-pilot" and swap roles for the third?
Wrt promoting our release process/scripts, I'd probably hold off a bit. We're on a journey to move more pieces onto Apache infrastructure. I'd prefer to direct energies to that. If we make a few more steps in that direction, our scripts will be closer to what other projects need and there'll probably be less to document too. Cheers, Paul. On 20 Jan 2017 12:34 AM, "Jochen Theodorou" <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: Hi all, since the release did get out, big thanks to Paul here, I think it would be good if the next release could be done by someone else than Paul or Cedric. For example me ;) That is because I would like us to have at least 4 or 5 people being able to do a release. And then there is the question if maybe our release process could be used as a model for git based projects in the incubator. There was a thread about such a skeleton not too long ago. Of course I am aware of that we have a slightly different publication location than most of them will have, but still. Also it would force us to create proper documentation of the process ;) bye Jochen
