On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> wrote: > My take is simpler than this. If Parrot should be included in 2.5, then > remove the old parser and use it. If it's for 3.0, then it should not belong > to the 2.5 beta, or it should be an external dependency (possibly tested by > adding a jar manually).
I like this approach very much! Depending on the perceived quality we always have an option of calling the first 2.5 alpha, but I'm very much in agreement with Cédric -- if we want to give it to users in 2.5 -- we need to get feedback ASAP (which would include me personally -- 'cuz I still haven't tried it in my projects and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone). Thanks, Roman.
