But Wouldn’t << be a natural choice which would work today?
-Jesper > On 7 Jan 2017, at 18.16, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > As we all know, GPars is awesome in concurrency programming. How about > introducing a new syntax for GPars's > actor(http://www.gpars.org/guide/guide/actors.html) to support concurrency > programming better like Erlang and > Scala(https://rocketeer.be/articles/concurrency-in-erlang-scala/)? We can > use <- to indicate sending messages(Erlang and Scala uses !). The initial > idea is shown as follows: > > // groovy.actor.Actor extends groovyx.gpars.actor.DefaultActor > class Counter extends groovy.actor.Actor { > int counter = 0; > > void act() { > react { int num -> > ... > } > } > } > > class ActorTest { > def counter = new Counter() > counter.start() > > for (i in 0 .. 100000) { > counter <- i // send message to the counter actor > } > } > > Any thoughts? > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-actor-syntax-for-Groovy-3-tp5737574.html > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
