I'm -1 on adding custom operators. We always said we wouldn't fall into the same trap as C++ or Scala, but instead allow overriding existing operators.
Le 30 oct. 2016 10:03, "Paolo Di Tommaso" <paolo.ditomm...@gmail.com> a écrit : > This sounds a cool feature for DSL writers. What characters are eligible > for custom operators? > > > Cheers, > Paolo > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 8:02 AM, 孙 岚 <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The new parser support defining custom operator now. The initial >> implementation is on the customOperator branch of groovy-parser( >> https://github.com/danielsun1106/groovy-parser/tree/customOperator). >> >> Some examples can be found at https://github.com/danielsun11 >> 06/groovy-parser/blob/c3259607c4ee0cda6e5619bed35d0674e26f78 >> aa/src/test/resources/core/CustomOperator_01x.groovy >> >> In order to make the custom operator have more priorities, the >> custom operators have lower priority by default, and the priority can be >> changed by using parentheses. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >
