As a side note, I'd like to conclude the decision about what to do with regards to backwards compatibility in "next major groovy version", in particular the decision about how to organize modules for jigsaw. I will dig into my archives and revive the discussion :-) Le 30 janv. 2016 10:18, "Jochen Theodorou" <blackd...@gmx.org> a écrit :
> yes > > On 30.01.2016 09:31, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > >> When you put the antlr v4 parser, you also mean the Java 8 constructs, I >> guess? >> >> Because otherwise, that's really my wish list too :-) >> >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org >> <mailto:blackd...@gmx.org>> wrote: >> >> On 29.01.2016 18:05, Clark Richey wrote: >> [...] >> >> What do you think about having a page on the web site that >> provides at least basic information about the status of on-going >> Groovy >> development? This will serve the dual purpose of letting people >> know >> that Groovy development isn’t dead and heighten awareness of the >> current >> lack of support for full time development of the language. >> >> >> I can make a wishlist like this: >> >> * integrate and complete antlr4 parser >> * complete spec for and implement MOP 3 >> * add c# inspired asnyc/await to Groovy and see if tight integration >> with gpars is possible >> * new joint compiler >> * JSR 269 support >> * java9 jigsaw support >> * complete macro system >> ... >> >> is that what you wanted? >> >> bye Jochen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Guillaume Laforge >> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member >> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com> >> >> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ >> Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ >> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> >> > >
