Ps: or use a container which supports enrichment instead or archive enrichment?
Le 8 oct. 2017 19:22, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> a écrit : > What about wrapping the contextual container and enrich it in deploy? > > Le 8 oct. 2017 18:54, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hey guys (maybe Mark specifically?) >> >> A number of people have been copying the pattern you helped create, where >> we use an archive appender in Arquillian to add test classes. This works, >> however it causes an issue. >> >> I opened a bug against Arquillian, because deployments that expect >> exceptions to be thrown are not testable. Deployments that are not >> testable do not execute archive appenders. I have a proposed fix, but the >> API is ugly. >> >> So I'm wondering, are there any other ideas to get tests running when >> deployment exceptions are expected? Otherwise I think I'll end up having >> to import the tests and modify them to mirror the results. It will mean >> needing to duplicate this group of tests: https://github.com/apac >> he/geronimo-safeguard/blob/master/safeguard-tck-tests/pom.xml#L80-L96 >> >> John >> >
