next one which fixes Fix GERONIMO-6165 https://github.com/salyh/jm14specsvn/commit/9563e09ba5ddfb74401eb7d5b37abb60ceb3ea7c
I replaced the original QuotedPrintable encoding/decoding stuff with mime4j (included as shaded jar) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Hendrik Dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your comments and the discussion so far. > > Here is another commit proposal for the spec jar which will fix two > jiras and i want to ask again for comments/feedback: > > https://github.com/salyh/jm14specsvn/commit/36befc6011aea101afc86d53a2398d14b9a50d66 > > This commit fixes: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5842 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6480 > > The Testcase for 6480 will be part of the impl project because james > is needed for that: > https://github.com/salyh/geronimo-javamail/commit/8290488e7911bab87bb07c8a3e9adefd9a368b0a > > Thanks > Hendrik > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Hendrik Dev <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> But despite of that the feature discussion is the important one. Have >>> not looked yet on greenmail 1.4 but i would like to use a "real" >>> mailserver to test the javamail impl. and james seems to be the >>> perfect candidate: >>> its an apache project, its (mostly) rfc compliant, its suitable for >>> unittesting and possibly synergy effects if the project use each >>> other. >> >> >> All sounds good. >> >>> >>> >>> The big problem of geronimo javamail (impl, not spec) is the (almost >>> complete) absence of unittests. Writing these should not be limited by >>> a fake implementation like greenmail especially for testing IMAP >>> (which is itself a mess already :-) >> >> >> Yes. Afraid most of the "testing" has been from the TCK. More unit tests >> would be fantastic! >> >> --kevan > > > > -- > Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) > @hendrikdev22 > PGP: 0x22D7F6EC -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
