We had a similar feedback from Niall during the first rollout of the website and then we increased the font-size of the disclaimer and the size of the incubator logo.
I'd agree with Dave and we should definitely improve but with a more proper specifics to nail it. On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Greg Chase <[email protected]> wrote: > That is good feedback for their feedback. > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Dave Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My first question is what's the goal - is there another ASF site that > would > > serve as an example to follow? > > Our current Apache info is a menu item at the bottom of the page. From > the > > report, I gather that the auditor wants to see the logos and disclaimer > > "above the fold". More prominent logos can be easily done, once we agree > on > > where they should be located. > > Can I safely assume that a [link to the disclaimer] is sufficient? > > The branding guide (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html) > > lacks > > specifics. > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Greg Chase <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Dear Geode community, > > > I see the Apache Geode website got tagged with a minor branding concern > > in > > > a recent audit of incubating projects. > > > > > > See the wiki entry here: > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 > > > > > > See start of the thread in [email protected] here: > > > > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201606.mbox/%3CCAOqetn-c49sfXSMck8hx%3DjGZQEw6paEmbdtMg32meLkHKcTPnQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > Basically the Apache & Apache incubator logos, and the incubator > > disclaimer > > > are not prominent enough, but at least they are present. > > > > > > Next time we look at a website update, we might see how we can make > these > > > more obvious. > > > > > > Suggestions are welcome on this thread. > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > -- ~/William
