John is Right...WAN is more than just a replication of data...In order to highlight and meaningful we have described this as Muti Site (WAN) Topology in GemFire docs...
-Anil. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, you can can replicate clusters over WAN, but as John was saying and > as per Mike's clubhouse presentation on WAN > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go9m8fOGZH0&feature=youtu.be>, there are > lots of different use cases that WAN opens up like Business unit > Active/Passive, Realm manager, follow the sun pattern etc. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Gregory Chase <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:53 AM, John Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hmmm, I disagree. > > > > > > Second, WAN is much more than Replication. It is a topology used in > > > Active-Active or DR architectures, or used perhaps for sending a select > > > subset, "filtered" (possibly transformed), information, based on > > locality, > > > and so on. To refer to WAN as just Replication would do it injustice > > IMO. > > > > > > > > Ok - I get you with regard to saving "replication" in the first bullet. > > However, I would like a more descriptive word than "WAN" for the latter > new > > feature. How about "WAN-replication" or "Cluster Replication"? > > > > -- > > Greg Chase > > > > Global Head, Big Data Communities > > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data > > > > Pivotal Software > > http://www.pivotal.io/ > > > > 650-215-0477 > > @GregChase > > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ > > >
