Hi Dor, I have done a short comparation, geode vs scylladb on three aspects, memory, disk, network. >From the whole distributed system's architecture, there are many similarities between geode and scylladb, share-nothing distribution, consistency level, client-server access mode, however some essential differences also be explicited.
I did a summary table, <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/over_arch_1.png> <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/over_archi_2.png> <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/mem_model.png> <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/mem_mngt.png> <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/disk_operation.png> <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/network_mngt.png> <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/program_model.png> <http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/file/n6555/HW_config.png> -- View this message in context: http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/Geode-on-OSv-Seastar-tp2201p6555.html Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubating) Developers Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
