-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46625/#review131437
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!




Ship It!


geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/Simple2CacheServerDUnitTest.java
 (line 37)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46625/#comment195423>

    Do we need to extend "CacheClientNotifierDUnitTest"?
    
    Reason is when you run this test, it also runs all the tests from 
CacheClientNotifierDUnitTest, which is kind of duplicate....


- anilkumar gingade


On April 29, 2016, 4:04 p.m., xiaojian zhou wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46625/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 29, 2016, 4:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode and anilkumar gingade.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-1183
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1183
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Current API allows us to create 2 cache servers on the same JVM, then the 
> client
>     will try to create 2 queues to that JVM, one secondary and one primary.
>     But the proxy is actually the same (since there's only one client), so the
>     CCN keeps destroying and recreating the proxy.
> 
>     To fix, we will keep the first proxy and reject the duplicate creating.
>     Then the secondary proxy will automatically become primary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/tier/sockets/CacheClientNotifier.java
>  1ba2294 
>   
> geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/CacheClientNotifierDUnitTest.java
>  8bf819c 
>   
> geode-wan/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/cache/wan/Simple2CacheServerDUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46625/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> xiaojian zhou
> 
>

Reply via email to