Hi Fluss community,

I would like to ask for review and feedback on the FIP for supporting implicit 
partition in Fluss:

FIP doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wDOkB-MuLrn3QYqL0fMlr1rj-lq891UbBcqXJSzCNcU/edit?usp=sharing

Tracking issue:
https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues/3435

I have also opened a draft/discussion PR to make the proposed implementation 
easier to review and discuss:
https://github.com/apache/fluss/pull/3475

The PR is intentionally kept as draft because the FIP has not been finalized 
yet. The goal is to provide concrete implementation details for discussion, 
including metadata model, table descriptor API, partition routing, lookup/write 
behavior, serde validation, and related connector/lake handling.

Any feedback on the design, API shape, compatibility concerns, or missing 
scenarios would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Liti

Reply via email to