+1. Let's keep the configs consistent.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 5:08 PM Gustavo de Morais <gustavopg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1(non-binding).
>
> Kind regards,
> Gustavo
>
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 at 08:13, Ron Liu <ron9....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1, make sense.
> >
> > Best,
> > Ron
> >
> > Hao Li <h...@confluent.io.invalid> 于2025年6月19日周四 13:22写道:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As part of the discussion in AsyncTableFunction PR [1], it's suggested
> to
> > > change the config name from `table.exec.async-table.buffer-capacity` to
> > > `table.exec.async-table.max-concurrent-operations`. I think the change
> > > makes sense and to make the model async config name
> > > consistent with async table, I'm proposing to change the proposed
> config
> > in
> > > this FLIP-525 from `table.exec.async-ml-predict.buffer-capacity` to
> > > `table.exec.async-ml-predict.max-concurrent-operations`.
> > >
> > > What do people think? If there's no objection, I'll go ahead and make
> the
> > > change in FLIP and code since the feature isn't released yet.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Hao
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/26567/files#r2144129856
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:47 AM Hao Li <h...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I was reminded that 72 hours means business days. So the vote is
> still
> > > > open :) Sorry about the confusion.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Hao
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:18 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 (binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 9:55 AM Piotr Nowojski <
> pnowoj...@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > +1 (binding)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best,
> > > >> > Piotrek
> > > >> >
> > > >> > niedz., 11 maj 2025 o 18:14 Hao Li <h...@confluent.io.invalid>
> > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi Dev,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks all for voting. I'm closing the vote and the result will
> be
> > > >> posted
> > > >> > > in a separate email.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > Hao
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 12:43 AM Martijn Visser <
> > > >> martijnvis...@apache.org>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 9:27 AM Yunfeng Zhou <
> > > >> flink.zhouyunf...@gmail.com
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Best,
> > > >> > > > > Yunfeng
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > 2025年5月9日 00:01,Hao Li <h...@confluent.io.INVALID> 写道:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-525: Model ML_PREDICT,
> > > >> ML_EVALUATE
> > > >> > > > > > Implementation Design [1], which has been discussed in
> this
> > > >> thread
> > > >> > > [2].
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there
> is
> > an
> > > >> > > > objection
> > > >> > > > > > or not enough votes.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > > > > Hao
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > [1]
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-525%3A+Model+ML_PREDICT%2C+ML_EVALUATE+Implementation+Design
> > > >> > > > > > [2]
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/880cxnw9ygsjl3x5w0kxrh4x5fw6mp4x
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >> Sergey
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to